Why NOLA Needs Sex Ed: A Q&A with the Founder of the [Program Name Redacted]

Jarratt Pytell, a former RSD teacher, started a sex education program in New Orleans as a and current [School Name Redacted] medical student.
Jarratt Pytell, a former RSD middle school math teacher, started a sex education program for New Orleans high schoolers while attending [School Name Redacted]

I first met Jarratt Pytell back in 2008, when I hired him to teach 7/8th grade math at Dr. Charles R. Drew Elementary in New Orleans. It was one of the best decisions I made, as he quickly gained my respect as a great teacher who always went above-and-beyond for his students. Although Jarratt eventually left the classroom to pursue his dream of becoming a doctor, he remained committed to serving children in New Orleans public schools. In 2011, he founded the [Program Name Redacted] ([Program Acronym Redacted]), a sex education program for local high schoolers, taught by volunteers from [School Name Redacted] in New Orleans.

With lawmakers considering bills that would mandate sex education for 7-12th graders in New Orleans, I reached out to Jarratt to ask about [Program Acronym Redacted], its impact, and what lessons he could share from his experience with the program. Thankfully, Jarratt found the time to respond (reproduced below) before he graduates from [School Name Redacted] later this month.1

Update: 5/13/15:

Jarratt graduated from [School Name Redacted] School of Medicine. Congratulations, Dr. Pytell!


Q: Tell me a little bit about your sex education program: When did it start, who are the teachers, what grades does it serve, how many students have you impacted?

The program is the called the [Program Name Redacted] ([Program Acronym Redacted]). It started back in 2011 as a project for my Albert Schweitzer Fellowship. The instructors are inter-professional students from all of [School Name Redacted] schools (allied health, medicine, nursing, dentistry, public health) who volunteer to lead a class through a comprehensive sexual and reproductive health and rights curriculum which takes place over multiple sessions. We go way beyond the standard anatomy lessons, STDs, etc., and go further into what positive relationships look like, what sexual coercion is, how to access healthcare, and students rights – a true comprehensive sexual and reproductive health and rights curriculum. Currently, the focus has been on the 10-12th grades and have reached hundreds of students at a local high school in New Orleans. We developed materials using model programs identified by the CDC.

Q: What motivated you to start this sex education program? Was a there a demand/need in the community for education on sexual health?

I was moved to act through my experience in the classroom with 8th graders who were participating in risky sexual behaviors in school and a student who had a baby. School teachers were unprepared to talk to their students about sex, and as a math teacher I commiserated. When I went to [School Name Redacted],  there was a large pool of motivated healthcare students with knowledge and desire to have a positive impact on the community. Luckily, we had a contact at a local high school where they have the same struggles as many local high schools in terms of teen pregnancy, risky sexual behaviors, and lack of practical knowledge about reproductive health and rights. The school had a desire to serve their students and invited us to host the program.

Q: What has your experience with this program been like? How have students responded to the program?

There are 3 main stakeholders. First, the students at the high school. They are genuinely interested and very mature in the discussions. The curriculum is conversation based which allows each class to lead the discussion. Personally, at the start, I was amazed at how much students knew about their bodies, yet how certain misconceptions persisted, and how little they knew about their rights and how to access healthcare.

Second, the teachers and administrators at the site are appreciative and usually join the discussions. Last, the instructors ([School Name Redacted] students) find value in interacting with students and helping the students succeed in school by keeping them happy and healthy. It’s also an opportunity to develop cultural competencies.

Q: What have you learned from teaching sex education to New Orleans high schoolers? Any surprises?

The students have lots of access to information on the internet and friends. With that comes false information. Instructors need to ask specific, open ended questions in order to appraise what students know about topics and find misconceptions. Students also want to have mature discussions. There is always a smirk or chuckle when discussions on any number of topics arise, but who doesn’t do that? It’s not unique for high schoolers to be uncomfortable talking about sex – many surveys show healthcare providers are just as bad at talking about sex.

It is also a good lesson on the effect of policy on public health. The current law doesn’t allow for students to be questioned/surveyed on the sexual/reproductive activities or beliefs. In order to stay on the very safe side, we can’t collect data on how effective the curriculum is. Also, the way the sex ed law is written, we must teach abstinence until marriage. This leaves instructors in a difficult place when talking to gay or lesbian adolescents, for example, since he or she can’t get married!

Q: Given your experience teaching sex education, what lessons or advice do you have for those lawmakers would will be considering bills that would launch a citywide sex education program in New Orleans?

It’s a move towards protecting the sexual and reproductive health and rights of certain adolescents in NOLA. Two things to consider is that the bill only makes it mandatory for grades 7-12. I believe sexual and reproductive health and rights education should be taught in earlier grades. First, many students are held back or behind in school. These students should not lose out on valuable information that could prevent teen pregnancy, sexually transmitted infections, and keep them being healthy and able to succeed in school just for being behind. Second, all people, from the youngest children to the oldest adults are sexual beings. We might not talk about it, but it’s true. Sexual and reproductive health and rights should start early with age-appropriate, evidence-based best practices.

While the two bills (sex ed requirement and ability to ask questions) are a step in the right direction, they are just one part of a larger policy change that needs to take place. Last year there was legislation that limited who could teach sex ed in schools. The law states that instructors who work for organizations that provide abortions (e.g., Planned Parenthood) are not allowed to teach sex ed in schools. Given that teachers are already over-extended, there needs to be a pipeline of skilled educators who are trained to deliver the instruction.

  1. I removed the name of the medical school and the name of the sex education program at the request of Jarratt, after some high-ups freaked out about it. 

My Letter to the House Education Committee Opposing House Bills 166 & 21

The House Education Committee will convene tomorrow to consider House Bills 166 & 21
The House Education Committee will convene tomorrow to consider House Bills 166 & 21

I sent the following letter to the members of the House Education Committee this morning urging them to vote against House Bill 166 & House Bill 21.

Dear House Education Committee Members, 

Greetings. I am writing to ask you to oppose two bills that the Committee is scheduled to consider tomorrow (May 6): House Bill 166 from Rep. Joseph Bouie and House Bill 21 from Rep. John Bel Edwards. 

I am a former New Orleans public school teacher and administrator and I’ve worked in both the pre-Katrina New Orleans Public School Schools system, as well as the Recovery School District. I have seen, firsthand, the tremendous improvements that have taken place in our city’s public schools as a result of the RSD’s reforms. Without question, New Orleans public school students are receiving a better education today than they did prior to Hurricane Katrina. That is why I am opposed to House Bill 166, which would require the immediate return of qualified RSD charter schools to the Orleans Parish School Board. 

While dozens of RSD charters are now performing at a level that would allow them to return to OPSB, all but one have refused to do so. Why? Because OPSB has yet to demonstrate it is ready for the return of schools. In fact, OPSB Superintendent Henderson Lewis admitted that fact in an interview with The Advocate, saying that he would prefer to work with the RSD over the longer term to ensure OPSB was ready for the return of schools:  “My plan is to work with the RSD and begin the process of bringing those functions to OPSB, so we can create a system where if every last school were to come back, we’ll have the infrastructure to do that.”

Moreover, the recent indictment of OPSB member Ira Thomas on bribery charges demonstrates that OPSB has yet to shed the culture of corruption and cronyism that plagued the board before the storm. The antics at school board meetings and OPSB’s inability to agree upon a permanent superintendent for nearly three years have further demonstrated that the board still needs to get its act together. 

When it comes to our public education system, the citizens of New Orleans are unwilling to return to the pre-Katrina status quo. That’s why public opinion polls have consistently shown that voters want to stick with the current policy of letting charter schools decide whether to return to OPSB. For all of these reasons, I urge you to vote against House Bill 166

I would also urge you to reject House Bill 21, which would prohibit BESE from approving a charter in a district graded  “A” or “B” which the local school board previously denied. Just because a district is graded “A” or “B” doesn’t mean the district is providing all students with the education they deserve. In those cases, BESE should have the power to approve a charter that can serve students trapped in low-performing schools. Turf battles among adults should never take precedence over the best interests of children. House Bill 21 would establish a blanket prohibition against cases when BESE can and should step in to provide families with better educational options and that’s why I urge you to vote against House Bill 21

Thank you for your time, and as always, thank you for your service!


Peter C. Cook

Click here to send an email to the House Education Committee urging them to oppose House Bill 166 & House Bill 21! 

What’s On Tap For The House Education Committee This Week

House Education Committee Chairman Steve Carter
House Education Committee Chairman Steve Carter

The House Education Committee will convene again this week on Wednesday at 9:00am. While this week’s agenda sticks with Chairman Steve Carter’s plan to knock out some of the less controversial (i.e., non-Common Core) bills up for consideration, there’s still a few important proposals up for debate.

Here’s a breakdown of the notable bills the committee will consider [full agenda below]:

  • House Bill 21 (Oppose) – This bill is nearly identical to a bill that Rep. Edwards filed last year that died in committee. Just because a school system received a designation of “A”, “B”, doesn’t mean it is necessarily meeting the needs of all of its students. BESE should not be prohibited from taking the steps it deems necessary to provide children with educational options.
  • House Bill 166 (Oppose) – New Orleanians are justifiably skeptical about the OPSB’s ability to resume control over the schools taken over by the Recovery School District. Opinion polls have shown little enthusiasm for the returning eligible schools to OPSB (and support for local control has no doubt further eroded in the wake of Ira Thomas’ indictment). Furthermore, the fact that only one charter has chosen to voluntarily return to local control shows that schools are skeptical, too. Lawmakers should stick with the current policy of letting eligible schools decide whether to stick with RSD or return to OPSB.
  • House Bill 180 (Support With Reservations) – I think it makes sense to prohibit the construction of schools on former waste sites, but I also think RSD has done the remediation needed to make the Booker T. Washington school site safe. Therefore, I would support this bill if it doesn’t apply retroactively.
  • House Bill 287 (Oppose) – I believe this bill would create an overly complex and inefficient process for textbook and material adoption, as well as increase the cost of textbooks for taxpayers.
  • House Bill 340 (Support) – Louisiana’s voucher program has not proven successful for the children it was intended to serve. Therefore, I support bills that seek to restrict the program.
  • House Bill 342 (Support) – The Meningococcal vaccine is on the World Health Organization’s List of Essential Medicines, a list of the most important medication needed in a basic health system. Seems like an important vaccine to ensure public health.
  • House Bill 410 (Support With Reservations) – I don’t exactly understand the motivations behind this bill, but a 20-minute lunch seems reasonable, so long as the bill does not mandate the location (i.e., must be in a cafeteria) where this 20 minute lunch period must occur.
  • House Bill 446 (Oppose) – If parents want to teach their kids about gun safety, they can do it at home. Guns don’t belong in a public school classroom.
  • House Bill 505 (Support With Reservations) – This bill would eliminate tenure for teachers entering the profession on or after July 1, 2015, but it seems prudent to hold off on this step and see how the tenure reforms set forth in Act 1 play out first.
  • House Bill 524 (Oppose) – This proposed constitutional amendment is clearly aimed reviving the effort to carve out a new school district – St. George – in southeast East Baton Rouge Parish. It would just open up a Pandora’s Box of messy problems down the road and should be rejected.
  • House Bill 537 (Oppose) – The bill is clearly aimed at situations like the fight over John McDonogh Senior High, which the RSD is planning to handover to a proven charter operator. This bill would prevent the RSD from providing more students with a high-quality education and should be rejected.